Journal for Nature Conservation . vol. 30Paru le : 01/05/2016 |
Exemplaires(0)
Disponibilité | ||
---|---|---|
aucun exemplaire |
Dépouillements
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panierBalancing conservation and climate change - a methodology using existing data demonstrated for twelve UK priority habitats / M. Sozanska-Stanton in Journal for Nature Conservation, vol. 30 (Année 2016)
[article]
Titre : Balancing conservation and climate change - a methodology using existing data demonstrated for twelve UK priority habitats Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : M. Sozanska-Stanton, Auteur ; et al., Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp. 76-89 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : habitat prioritaire conservation gestion changement climatique gaz à effet de serre Résumé : "Mitigation of climate change (CC) is a regulating ecosystem service provided by priority habitats that is often co-delivered alongside their conservation of biodiversity. Carefully planned conservation management is thought necessary to support biodiversity adaptation to CC, but could also contribute to CC mitigation. This paper presents a methodology for assessing direct emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG: CO2, CH4 and N2O) from 12 UK priority habitats in 26 Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) using readily available data. Background emissions are estimated on the basis of published field research. The contribution of conservation management to GHG emission reduction is estimated using the IPCC GHG accounting methodology and other methods. Management Data Acquisition surveys carried out at selected SACs provided data on management practises for Scotland and Wales. Climate change mitigation actions identified in this study for priority habitats included livestock removal or change in stocking density, with GHG reduction potential of up to 3 tCO2e/animal/year, afforestation of acid grasslands—up to 19.4 tCO2e/ha/year, wetland restoration—0.3–0.8 tCO2e/ha/year and cessation of moorland burning—6.9 tCO2e/ha/year. Estimated GHG emissions from priority habitats can be used to identify win:win management options that co-deliver GHG mitigation, climate adaptation and conservation benefits for consideration by policy makers and conservation managers." (source : auteurs) Type de publication : périodique Référence biblio : Sozanska-Stanton M., et al., 2016 - Balancing conservation and climate change - a methodology using existing data demonstrated for twelve UK priority habitats. Journal for Nature Conservation, 30 : 76-89. ID PMB : 65431 DOI : 10.1016/j.jnc.2016.01.005 Permalink : http://www.cbnbrest.fr/catalogue_en_ligne/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=65431
in Journal for Nature Conservation > vol. 30 (Année 2016) . - pp. 76-89[article]Exemplaires(0)
Disponibilité aucun exemplaire The loss of biodiversity conservation in EU research programmes: Thematic shifts in biodiversity wording in the environment themes of EU research programmes FP7 and Horizon 2020 / J.F. Admiraal in Journal for Nature Conservation, vol. 30 (Année 2016)
[article]
Titre : The loss of biodiversity conservation in EU research programmes: Thematic shifts in biodiversity wording in the environment themes of EU research programmes FP7 and Horizon 2020 Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : J.F. Admiraal, Auteur ; C.J.M. Musters, Auteur ; G.R. (de) Snoo, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : pp. 12-18 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [ZG] Europe Mots-clés : conservation de la biodiversité évaluation économique service écosystémique politique environnementale Commission européenne Résumé : "Society has been seeking ways to express biodiversity's value to stimulate its protection. Economic valuation of ecosystem services has had limited success to motivate biodiversity protection and reaching the EU 2020 biodiversity strategy targets is in danger of failure. The expression of biodiversity's value in policy documents thus becomes a topic of discussion, because it greatly influences the ways policy makers think about environmental problems. We present an analysis of the word use related to biodiversity conservation versus ecosystem services in the environment themes of the FP7 and Horizon 2020 research work programs of the European Commission in the period of 2007–2014, and the projects accepted under these themes. We conclude first that biodiversity was lost as a topic in the transition from FP7 to Horizon 2020, accompanied by a three-quarters loss of biodiversity topics in the projects accepted under these research work programs. Moreover, the use of ‘ecosystem services’ was 1.5 times higher at the end of that period compared to the beginning in the research work programs, to the detriment of the use of ‘sustainability’ and ‘conservation’ which halved during that same period. In the light of international commitments to biodiversity conservation, the focus toward ecosystem services and away from conservation is of great concern." (source : auteurs) Type de publication : périodique Référence biblio : Admiraal J.-F., Musters C.-J.-M., Snoo G.-R. (de), 2016 - The loss of biodiversity conservation in EU research programmes: Thematic shifts in biodiversity wording in the environment themes of EU research programmes FP7 and Horizon 2020. Journal for Nature Conservation, 30 : 12-18. ID PMB : 65432 Permalink : http://www.cbnbrest.fr/catalogue_en_ligne/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=65432
in Journal for Nature Conservation > vol. 30 (Année 2016) . - pp. 12-18[article]Exemplaires(0)
Disponibilité aucun exemplaire